01
Heppner v. SDNY, 2026.
A federal court ruled consumer AI prompts are not privileged. Discovery now reaches your AI history.
Safely use AI with sensitive documents and live video meetings with verifiable audit logs and opt-in access to frontier cloud models.
v1.0 · Beta — open · macOS first
Trusted by teams navigating
01 — Problem
A short read of the regulatory, professional, and insurance landscape now shaping how sensitive work gets done.
01
A federal court ruled consumer AI prompts are not privileged. Discovery now reaches your AI history.
02
The ABA and most state bars added auditability and supervision rules in the last 18 months.
03
Renewal questionnaires now ask for a written AI policy. Some carriers exclude AI-related claims outright.
04
Therapy notes and SUD records lose heightened protection the moment they enter cloud AI. (See Illinois AI Therapy Act.)
05
Term sheets and borrower data pasted into consumer AI surface in LP diligence and SEC exams.
06
The VA, federal defenders, and most courts prohibit consumer AI tools for case work.
Most teams are working around this with shadow AI. Sotto removes the need to.
02 — Workspace
Four functions working together: Redact, Route, Convert, Audit. Local AI by default. Cloud models when you choose. Always auditable.
The primitives are open source. Sotto packages them into a compliance-ready workspace. See the architecture ↓
01
Automatically detects and protects sensitive content (privilege, PHI, NPI, MNPI) before it ever leaves the machine.
02
Decides whether a request stays fully local or, with your explicit approval, calls a frontier cloud model.
03
Generates a high-fidelity synthetic replica of sensitive content so you can safely use frontier cloud models without exposing real data.
04
Cryptographically logs every action (local or cloud) so the full chain of work stays verifiable in court, on exam, or in diligence.


03 — Surfaces
Sotto protects both surfaces where sensitive work actually happens — the files you open and the conversations you join.
Documents & text
Privileged filings, case notes, CIMs, term sheets, borrower financials, session notes. Drag them into Sotto and draft, summarize, or analyze without anything leaving your machine.
Live meetings
Real-time transcription, redaction, and audit for sensitive calls: intake interviews, therapy sessions, deal diligence, depositions. Every word stays on your machine by default.
04 — Architecture & Proof
Sotto is built on five open-source primitives. Read the code, run the verifier, and confirm the privacy claims yourself under Apache-2.0.
shield
Policy engine. Classifies content sensitivity and enforces what may leave the machine.
View source →redact
Detects and protects privilege, PHI, NPI, and MNPI before any model call.
View source →audit
Cryptographically signed, hash-chained log of every action (local or cloud). Externally verifiable.
View source →route
Decides, with explicit approval, whether a request stays local or calls a frontier cloud model.
View source →convert
Generates high-fidelity synthetic replicas so cloud models work on safe surrogates, never real data.
View source →The industry says "trust us." Sotto says: download the CLI and verify it yourself.
$ ogentic-audit verify ./matter-2024-CV-3047.log
Run the verifier yourself →The primitives are open source under Apache-2.0. The Sotto Desktop, Sotto Notes, and managed deployment are commercial.
05 — Who it's for
01
≤10 attorneys
Trial lawyers, boutique litigation, IP, and family-law shops handling privileged work.
When this matters
Post-Heppner client alerts, NY audit rule, LPL questionnaires.
"You've answered an LPL renewal asking about AI in the last 90 days."
02
& Behavioral Health Practices
Clinicians and group practices with PHI, SUD, and Part 2 records.
When this matters
Part 2 notes, Illinois / Nevada / Utah AI therapy laws, HIPAA documentation.
"Local execution is the only way to preserve heightened protections."
03
Funds, BDCs, ad hoc lender groups
Analysts and PMs handling term sheets, borrower financials, and sensitive deal data.
When this matters
MNPI handling, LP diligence on AI usage, SEC focus on data flow.
"Term sheets and borrower data belong on the analyst's machine, not in a chat window."
04
VA, Federal Defenders, Courts, Bars
Government legal teams under explicit consumer-AI prohibitions.
When this matters
Explicit consumer-AI bans + need for court-defensible records.
"Your CIO blocked consumer AI but your team still needs AI to do the work."
Built for teams where one wrong paste is a regulatory event. Not for general consumer use.
06 — Difference
| Capability | Cloud-first AI | DIY local tools | Sotto |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model Quality | Frontier | Limited | Frontier (local 70B + opt-in cloud) |
| Data Leaves Your Machine | Always | Never | Only when you explicitly approve |
| Live Meetings (Zoom / Meet / Teams) | Cloud transcription | — | ✓. Sotto Notes, local with audit |
| Externally Verifiable Audit | —(vendor-attested) | — | ✓open-source CLI |
| Open-Source Primitives | —(black box) | Varies | ✓. Shield, Redact, Audit, Route, Convert |
| Privilege / Part 2 / NPI Safe | — | Partial | ✓by architecture |
| Vertical Specialization | Some | — | Legal, Behavioral Health, Finance |
| Regulatory Fit | Cloud-bound | DIY | Designed for it |
Every other regulated AI tool is cloud-first. None offers fully local execution + cryptographically verifiable audit. That is genuine white space, especially for private credit teams managing MNPI handling.
07 — Pricing
AI notetaker for Zoom, Meet, and Teams. Local transcription, no raw recording in the cloud.
/mo per seat
Local AI by default. Cloud models when you choose. Always auditable.
/mo per seat
Beta now
Multi-user firms, shared vault + team audit
/mo
Coming soon
Courts, public defenders, government legal
Institutional pilots
Design partners get locked-in beta pricing for 24 months + direct input on roadmap.
08 — Library
Twenty-one white papers covering regulatory requirements, competitive positioning, buyer checklists, and the architecture of verifiable AI.
Join the limited Design-Partner Beta. 15–20 organizations only. 90-day test against your real documents and live meetings, whether you're a lawyer, therapist, or private credit analyst.
Spots are limited. We prioritize teams with a clear regulatory, insurance, or LP audit pain point.